top of page
Marc Locatelli
Candidate for the TGR Board of Directors

This May Not Be the Last Pipeline

Marc Locatelli
3 days ago
4 min read

What TGR’s POA can do now, and before the next pipeline or corridor comes through

 

A new pipeline corridor is being cut through TGR. Owners whose properties it crosses face easement negotiations and lasting limits on how they can use part of their land. Nearby owners may also deal with heavy equipment, construction traffic, and unanswered questions.

 

This may not be the last pipeline through TGR. That raises two fair questions: What can the POA do during this project, and what should it do differently next time?

 

Is This Really the POA’s Role?

 

Some will say pipelines are outside a POA’s role. The company negotiates easements with individual owners, and the POA cannot dictate a route. But the Board works with outside entities such as Walker County and the City of Huntsville. A pipeline company building through the neighborhood is an outside entity too.

 

The governing documents give the Board a basis to consider the community’s interests. The Articles identify maintaining “the interior roadways, gates, fences, and culverts” and furthering “the best interests of the property owners” among the Association’s purposes.

 

The POA does not have to control a project to have a legitimate interest in what it does to our roads and neighborhood.

 

The Neighbors Without a Seat at the Table

 

The owner whose property the pipeline crosses may negotiate an easement. The neighbor across the road still hears the noise. The same is true for owners who share roads with construction traffic but have no part in those discussions.

 

Who speaks for those shared interests if not the POA? That does not mean negotiating private easements or giving legal advice. It means asking what can be done about the project’s effects on the neighborhood as a whole.

 

What Was Done This Time?

 

One owner reports being told by the pipeline company that the POA could have negotiated quiet hours, including when work could start and stop and which days crews could work. I can’t confirm exactly what was said or whether those arrangements were available.

 

The larger question is the route. Was an existing pipeline corridor considered? Did the POA ask the company to use it? There may have been engineering, safety, or legal reasons that made this impossible. If so, owners deserve to know whether the option was explored and what the company said.

 

Did the Board discuss work hours, workdays, advance notice, traffic, road repairs, drainage, or restoration with the company? Did the company need an agreement with the POA for access, a road crossing, or work on Association property? If so, what terms were included?

 

These are reasonable questions, not accusations. Perhaps the Board made a real effort or faced obstacles it could not overcome. Perhaps opportunities were missed. Owners deserve to know what happened.

 

What the POA Can Do Now

 

Even if the route can no longer be changed, the project is not over. The POA could name a point of contact, or tell owners who that contact already is. It could post verified updates and schedules on TownSq, explain how to report problems, and send the company one coordinated list of owners’ questions about work hours, notice, traffic, roads, drainage, and restoration. It could also ask the company to hold an informational meeting.

 

Our POA asking once beats every owner asking alone.

 

Questions for the Candidates

 

With elections approaching, owners have a chance to ask the incumbents how this project was handled. Here are questions I would ask:

 

  • The corridor: Before the route was final, did TGR ask the company to use an existing corridor? Who asked, when, and what was the answer?

  • Your role: What part did you personally play, if any?

  • Construction impacts: Did the Board raise work hours, workdays, advance notice, road repairs, or restoration with the company?

  • Agreements and records: Did the POA enter into any easement, crossing, or access agreement with the company? What decisions were made, and how were they documented and communicated to owners?

  • Lessons: What would you do differently next time?

 

And for every candidate, including me: What should the POA’s role be when the next pipeline or major infrastructure project comes through TGR?

 

A Board can govern well even when a company says no. It can engage, keep a record of its efforts, and tell owners the outcome.

 

What the POA Could Do Next Time

 

  • Start early. Survey requests and right-of-entry letters can be an early sign that a project is being considered. That is the time to identify the company and start asking questions.

  • Name a point person. A director or Board-appointed owner committee could coordinate with the company and keep owners informed.

  • Find out what process applies. Different projects may involve different regulators and opportunities for public input. The POA should identify those early and tell owners when and how they can participate.

  • Ask in writing. Ask the pipeline company about the existing corridor, work hours and days, advance notice, traffic, road conditions, drainage, and restoration. If the company needs access to Common Areas or Association-controlled roads, put the terms in an agreement.

  • Be the information source. Keep available route maps, schedules, company contacts, verified updates, and answers to common questions in one place on TownSq.

  • Keep the record. Projects can span several Boards. The Association should preserve its agreements, questions, responses, and decisions so future Boards can see what was asked, promised, and done.

 

Representing the Whole Neighborhood

 

The POA represents the neighborhood as a whole. Engaging on a project like this is not overreach. Sometimes representing the community means looking beyond our property lines.

 

My commitment is straightforward. If elected, I will push the Board to engage early, ask in writing about the concerns owners raise, and tell owners what was asked and what answer we received. Even when the answer is no, owners should hear from their Board about the efforts made on their behalf.

 

“Neighbors helping neighbors” means paying attention when a project affects the people around us and looking for practical ways to help. We may not be able to change this route. We can help owners through this project and change how TGR handles the next one.

 

The best time to prepare for the next pipeline or corridor is before the survey crews arrive.

 

This post reflects my perspective as an owner and a candidate. It is not an Association finding of fact or legal advice.

 

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page